Just Dreaming: 2010 Superhawk?
#1
Just Dreaming: 2010 Superhawk?
Just something to think about while the weather's cold and wet. With Ducati, KTM and Aprilia all rolling out V-twins, the market seems to be shifting back in the VTR's favor. It seems like a return to the SuperHawk concept but with fuel injection and a little less bodywork would be a good step for Honda.
I would love to see the concept V4 used as the powerplant for a new 150+ hp VTR that could compete with the newer Ducati's. That same engine could be detuned for a fully-faired VFR. -Or would the increase in engine weight put the handling more in line with the Busa or V-Max?
Just a thought.
I would love to see the concept V4 used as the powerplant for a new 150+ hp VTR that could compete with the newer Ducati's. That same engine could be detuned for a fully-faired VFR. -Or would the increase in engine weight put the handling more in line with the Busa or V-Max?
Just a thought.
#5
Some revised pistons and cam timing could get a few more HP but I'd settle for the FI and a 5 gallon tank!
#6
Gotta agree with inde here, but just for the sake of discussion I think they could use the RC-51 engine/FI etc. (God knows it's paid for) as a basis for a bike with a more streetable chassis and suspension. Make it semi-naked and I think it would make a pretty nice bike. Just a thought.
#10
#11
1. The current VFR has no peers, but is still a twenty-year-old design -save for a few upgrades. It's a bread and butter model for Honda that has the potential to play host to a redesigned V4 platform which could serve as a foundation for at least 3 new/updated derivations -ala the BMW K series -with a "naked," "VFR," and "ST."
2. Such a unified platform could play host to a naked/cafe which could smoke Buell, Ducati, Aprillia, KTM and B-King, a new VFR which could out-refine the Busa/Ninja 1400, and an ST which could compete with the FJ1300 and Concours. -The current ST is an awsome bike, but it's closer to the G-Wing than the FJ or C14. Keep in mind that Honda's history is not to compete with any of the aboved-mentioned bikes, but rather to redefine the classes. The possibilities of what they could do with a 1100+ V4 platform is endless.
3. The inline engine has gone just about as far as it can go. CBR/GSR-R/Ninja's can't continue to evolve at their previous pace and remain a viable engine for the road. V4's now offer a wider powerband with no road-worthy compormise over a higher-reving inline. Let the Big 4 continue to develop the inlines, but they've out-performed their practicallity for the key demographic rider. The V's have benefited so much from the inline's evolution that they've outdone the inlines for everyday use.
4. Honda's r/d has been all about CBRs and VTXs for so long now that they're currently behind their rivals in this class. The only "new" design Honda has offered this year has been a concept themed around the V4 and it's future and history with the company. They're not stupid -except for maybe the DN-01- so they have to be thinking along these lines if they expect to remain viable in the market.
I expect to see some good, and long-overdue, things from Honda in the next year or two. It'd be nice if something would come close to having the soul that the SuperHawk does.
-Brian
#12
I'm enjoying this thread...
Where do you guys think the Honda NAS fits into this picture if at all? I realize that it's a concept bike but my hope is that it wasn't all in vain.
Just curious?
Where do you guys think the Honda NAS fits into this picture if at all? I realize that it's a concept bike but my hope is that it wasn't all in vain.
Just curious?
Last edited by SkullHeadNoPants; 01-02-2009 at 02:05 PM.
#13
V4s do not sell well to squids. Honda wants to keep their market-share. If Honda stepped up and made a naked V4 or Twin there would be alot of happy people around. Just look at Buell though. Everybody screamed thet if they would make a water-cooled sport/naked bike the public would buy it. So far that is not the case! They can't give those ugly things away. It is a shame because I thought the Lightning and Firebolt were very pretty they just had shitty powerplants.
#14
The powerplants of Buell were ****, and they looked good. Now, they look like **** and the powerplants a awesome...WTF??? OK, so the new ones don't look completely like ****, but there is much to be desired.
Rooster, I know where you are coming from on the selling point, but end result is performance. If an engine configuration other than I-4 is the best, that is what will sell.
Rooster, I know where you are coming from on the selling point, but end result is performance. If an engine configuration other than I-4 is the best, that is what will sell.
#15
All you have to do to get squids to change from I4's to something else is to have more HP. All squids care about is HP never mind the fact that most cannot apply all that HP into a corner (hell I cant get out of 3rd on Palomar)
#16
V4s do not sell well to squids. Honda wants to keep their market-share. If Honda stepped up and made a naked V4 or Twin there would be alot of happy people around. Just look at Buell though. Everybody screamed thet if they would make a water-cooled sport/naked bike the public would buy it. So far that is not the case! They can't give those ugly things away. It is a shame because I thought the Lightning and Firebolt were very pretty they just had shitty powerplants.
#17
Saying the I-4 is used up is premature. Yamaha's new R1 has a new crank/firing order that makes the engine act more like a v4 (from their moto GP design) and an I-4's simplicity and cost of manufacture can't be denied, especially now that there's an economic crunch.
That said, I'd love to see a lighter, better V4 platform from Honda. Even if they updated the Interceptor's engine and shoehorned it into a lighter(much lighter) bike.
I think the next thing to explore are super light sportbikes. How about a sub 300lb bike built around Aprilia's 550cc V-twin supermoto engine?
That said, I'd love to see a lighter, better V4 platform from Honda. Even if they updated the Interceptor's engine and shoehorned it into a lighter(much lighter) bike.
I think the next thing to explore are super light sportbikes. How about a sub 300lb bike built around Aprilia's 550cc V-twin supermoto engine?
#18
I, respectfully, hope you're wrong here. If you look at the competition and the V4 Dog and Pony show Honda put on at Cologne, Honda is poised for a "make or break" release for 2010. Here's my prediction... If they don't follow suit, then they've missed the boat:
1. The current VFR has no peers, but is still a twenty-year-old design -save for a few upgrades. It's a bread and butter model for Honda that has the potential to play host to a redesigned V4 platform which could serve as a foundation for at least 3 new/updated derivations -ala the BMW K series -with a "naked," "VFR," and "ST."
2. Such a unified platform could play host to a naked/cafe which could smoke Buell, Ducati, Aprillia, KTM and B-King, a new VFR which could out-refine the Busa/Ninja 1400, and an ST which could compete with the FJ1300 and Concours. -The current ST is an awsome bike, but it's closer to the G-Wing than the FJ or C14. Keep in mind that Honda's history is not to compete with any of the aboved-mentioned bikes, but rather to redefine the classes. The possibilities of what they could do with a 1100+ V4 platform is endless.
3. The inline engine has gone just about as far as it can go. CBR/GSR-R/Ninja's can't continue to evolve at their previous pace and remain a viable engine for the road. V4's now offer a wider powerband with no road-worthy compormise over a higher-reving inline. Let the Big 4 continue to develop the inlines, but they've out-performed their practicallity for the key demographic rider. The V's have benefited so much from the inline's evolution that they've outdone the inlines for everyday use.
4. Honda's r/d has been all about CBRs and VTXs for so long now that they're currently behind their rivals in this class. The only "new" design Honda has offered this year has been a concept themed around the V4 and it's future and history with the company. They're not stupid -except for maybe the DN-01- so they have to be thinking along these lines if they expect to remain viable in the market.
I expect to see some good, and long-overdue, things from Honda in the next year or two. It'd be nice if something would come close to having the soul that the SuperHawk does.
-Brian
1. The current VFR has no peers, but is still a twenty-year-old design -save for a few upgrades. It's a bread and butter model for Honda that has the potential to play host to a redesigned V4 platform which could serve as a foundation for at least 3 new/updated derivations -ala the BMW K series -with a "naked," "VFR," and "ST."
2. Such a unified platform could play host to a naked/cafe which could smoke Buell, Ducati, Aprillia, KTM and B-King, a new VFR which could out-refine the Busa/Ninja 1400, and an ST which could compete with the FJ1300 and Concours. -The current ST is an awsome bike, but it's closer to the G-Wing than the FJ or C14. Keep in mind that Honda's history is not to compete with any of the aboved-mentioned bikes, but rather to redefine the classes. The possibilities of what they could do with a 1100+ V4 platform is endless.
3. The inline engine has gone just about as far as it can go. CBR/GSR-R/Ninja's can't continue to evolve at their previous pace and remain a viable engine for the road. V4's now offer a wider powerband with no road-worthy compormise over a higher-reving inline. Let the Big 4 continue to develop the inlines, but they've out-performed their practicallity for the key demographic rider. The V's have benefited so much from the inline's evolution that they've outdone the inlines for everyday use.
4. Honda's r/d has been all about CBRs and VTXs for so long now that they're currently behind their rivals in this class. The only "new" design Honda has offered this year has been a concept themed around the V4 and it's future and history with the company. They're not stupid -except for maybe the DN-01- so they have to be thinking along these lines if they expect to remain viable in the market.
I expect to see some good, and long-overdue, things from Honda in the next year or two. It'd be nice if something would come close to having the soul that the SuperHawk does.
-Brian
#19
Rooster- Buell answered the requests by building the powerful engine everyone wanted. Then they put it in a heavy frame with hideous plastic to completely ruin it. Americans should stick to what they know, the ancient design of HD which sells like candy at the fair to all the image concerned wannabe's.
Here is an excellent platform in desperate need of a V twin or V4. The CB1000R. Not available in America...bastards.
Here is an excellent platform in desperate need of a V twin or V4. The CB1000R. Not available in America...bastards.
#20
V4s do not sell well to squids. Honda wants to keep their market-share. If Honda stepped up and made a naked V4 or Twin there would be alot of happy people around. Just look at Buell though. Everybody screamed thet if they would make a water-cooled sport/naked bike the public would buy it. So far that is not the case! They can't give those ugly things away. It is a shame because I thought the Lightning and Firebolt were very pretty they just had shitty powerplants.
I've seen quotes from respected bike designers to the effect (specifically) that they would never sell a bike with the steering geometry of the Buells.
For me it's the less than steller build quality and the ancient engine that's way to tall for a sport bike.
#21
RC51 engined retro ($22,000! ouch!) - Seems Honda had engines going spare in 2004
http://www.vincentmotors.com/BIK/sport.php
http://www.vincentmotors.com/NEW/pdfs/RobbReport.pdf
http://www.vincentmotors.com/BIK/sport.php
http://www.vincentmotors.com/NEW/pdfs/RobbReport.pdf
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CentralCoaster
General Discussion
6
01-01-2011 12:20 PM