Chatterbox or Blutek
01-06-2009 | 04:29 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Superstock
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 344
Chatterbox or Blutek
A friend of mine and I are looking into communication devices and he’s leaning towards Chatterbox GMRSX1 (http://www.chatterboxusa.com/cbx1unit.html) and I’m leaning towards a Bluetek LLC. (http://www.blutekhelmet.com/shop.php).
I’ve looked into the Chatterbox X1 Bluetooth and came to these conclusions:
1) Have to wire in and install the headset and mic into the helmet, which means messing with my helmet.
2) Have to mount the transmitter in the bike or mount it on the side of my helmet (ugly).
3) A cord runs from the unit in the helmet (that I have to install) down to the transmitter that I would install under the seat area, and that sound uncomfortable.
When I looked into the Bluetek helmet, I came to these conclusions:
1) I’ve read only one review on this helmet, good, but only one. (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=176636#post176636)
2) Not 100% confident in Bluetooth technology.
What do you guys think?
I’ve looked into the Chatterbox X1 Bluetooth and came to these conclusions:
1) Have to wire in and install the headset and mic into the helmet, which means messing with my helmet.
2) Have to mount the transmitter in the bike or mount it on the side of my helmet (ugly).
3) A cord runs from the unit in the helmet (that I have to install) down to the transmitter that I would install under the seat area, and that sound uncomfortable.
When I looked into the Bluetek helmet, I came to these conclusions:
1) I’ve read only one review on this helmet, good, but only one. (https://www.superhawkforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=176636#post176636)
2) Not 100% confident in Bluetooth technology.
What do you guys think?
01-06-2009 | 05:59 PM
#2
Senior Member
SuperBike
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,051
From: Portland, Oregon
a few of the guys i ride with have had the two main communication devices. i have a chatterbox, first version of the x1 units. it finally died.
the conclusion is the Autocomm is the better of the two.
i wired in my headphones it's a pretty easy thing to do. blue tooth is a very proven reliable system.
tim
the conclusion is the Autocomm is the better of the two.
i wired in my headphones it's a pretty easy thing to do. blue tooth is a very proven reliable system.
tim
01-06-2009 | 08:11 PM
#3
Member
Squid
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 52
From: Greenville, ME
I haven't heard a whole lot of good about the chatter boxs. I don't know anything about the bluetek. I run a starcom on mine. It works great. I would definitely recommend the starcom or the autocom. Both are good systems, and worth the extra cash over the chatterbox.
01-07-2009 | 01:52 AM
#4
Senior Member
SuperSport
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 987
From: San Diego, CA
Cardo is another option.
The bluetooth feature is useful and quite functional, it does FM radio, and works between riders if you're reasonably close.
I don't have experience with the other systems. This one is cheaper, so keep that in consideration when comparing.
How compatible is that blutek with other rider's radios?
The bluetooth feature is useful and quite functional, it does FM radio, and works between riders if you're reasonably close.
I don't have experience with the other systems. This one is cheaper, so keep that in consideration when comparing.
How compatible is that blutek with other rider's radios?
01-07-2009 | 11:01 AM
#6
Senior Member
SuperBike
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,216
From: Westerly, RI
Here is another option. I've read their site and talked with a representative.
http://www.benchmarkhelmets.com/prod...bts300_83.html
Seems like a decent unit, or at least comparable to the Chatterbox. Says it does wireless Bluetooth Stereo audio, which I know the chatterbox does not. You can connect a MP3 to the Chatterbox via a cable.
http://www.benchmarkhelmets.com/prod...bts300_83.html
Seems like a decent unit, or at least comparable to the Chatterbox. Says it does wireless Bluetooth Stereo audio, which I know the chatterbox does not. You can connect a MP3 to the Chatterbox via a cable.
01-07-2009 | 12:37 PM
#7
Senior Member
Superstock
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 308
Ive got a set of chatterboxes and don't have any complaints. The Range on them is awesome (more than 2 miles in the Santa Monica Mountains) and the sound quality is decent for speaking, I don't use em with music, so can't comment there.
01-07-2009 | 03:35 PM
#8
Senior Member
SuperSport
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 987
From: San Diego, CA
Yeah, the range on Cardo sucks. But they're only about $150/pair. Good for passengers, or people that stay in a group. If I get out of radio range I just use the blue tooth to call them.
I have the stock windscreen, and hearing is ok up to about 80mph. My Shoei leaks a lot of air around my ears though. The radio reception sucks in the back country. You can hook it up to an mp3 player too, but it only plays the right stereo channel. I don't know why they did that. Maybe because having music in both ears is against the vehicle code or something.
I have the stock windscreen, and hearing is ok up to about 80mph. My Shoei leaks a lot of air around my ears though. The radio reception sucks in the back country. You can hook it up to an mp3 player too, but it only plays the right stereo channel. I don't know why they did that. Maybe because having music in both ears is against the vehicle code or something.
Last edited by CentralCoaster; 01-07-2009 at 03:37 PM.
01-07-2009 | 09:04 PM
#9
Junior Member
Squid
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 19
From: Gilroy, CA
the chatterbox bluetooth works well...i work at cyclegear and i have sold a good number of them, haven't had any complaints about them. Also, Oneal has a new street helmet that we just got in the stores today, stereo headset, linkable to 3 bluetooth devices with intercom also. Akuma helmets also has the same features in some of their helmets as well as Dainese.....all of which have great quality.
11-16-2010 | 10:20 AM
#10
Light Whore
Squid
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 45
Yeah, the range on Cardo sucks. But they're only about $150/pair. Good for passengers, or people that stay in a group. If I get out of radio range I just use the blue tooth to call them.
I have the stock windscreen, and hearing is ok up to about 80mph. My Shoei leaks a lot of air around my ears though. The radio reception sucks in the back country. You can hook it up to an mp3 player too, but it only plays the right stereo channel. I don't know why they did that. Maybe because having music in both ears is against the vehicle code or something.
I have the stock windscreen, and hearing is ok up to about 80mph. My Shoei leaks a lot of air around my ears though. The radio reception sucks in the back country. You can hook it up to an mp3 player too, but it only plays the right stereo channel. I don't know why they did that. Maybe because having music in both ears is against the vehicle code or something.
11-16-2010 | 03:34 PM
#13
Senior Member
Superstock
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 320
From: Arlington Heights, IL
Funny...I like not having to talk with my wife when I'm riding....Kind of a bonus
11-28-2010 | 09:41 AM
#15
Member
Squid
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 65
My girlfriend and I use a set of scala Q2's and really like having them. Most of the conversation is around "look at that hilarious *insert odd sight here*".
Range is fine for me. One of us really has to book it to get out of range. At highway speeds we can't hear each other at all.
No experience with other comm systems but;
In emergency situations I found it to be great. If you shout during an accident the other person is likely to know something is up and can at the very least stop and get traffic to slow down before a blind corner from one direction.
In general I think comm devices are huge benefits to riding in groups of even 2 or more. Hand signals get pretty complicated beyond "gas", "bathroom", or "tired".
Range is fine for me. One of us really has to book it to get out of range. At highway speeds we can't hear each other at all.
No experience with other comm systems but;
In emergency situations I found it to be great. If you shout during an accident the other person is likely to know something is up and can at the very least stop and get traffic to slow down before a blind corner from one direction.
In general I think comm devices are huge benefits to riding in groups of even 2 or more. Hand signals get pretty complicated beyond "gas", "bathroom", or "tired".
11-28-2010 | 02:45 PM
#16
Senior Member
MotoGP
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,053
From: NYC
Are you trying to speak to just the passenger or the rest of the world too? If you just want to the passenger then the parameters of what you want are different. I originally bought the bike to bike chatterbox but realized I dont want to talk to other bikes, just my wife so the hjc 50 was the best choice. I can add in the ipod & still hear her up to 80ish. Also lets me hear stereo sound on solo rides from the ipod. Seems like cell phone talking on a bike may be spending too much of your dime. I have tried it but am never willing to sacrafice safety for it so havent done it since. I thought that is what seperated us from the cagers.
11-29-2010 | 05:11 PM
#17
Senior Member
SuperBike
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,167
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
