Everything Else Anything and everything NON-VTR related

Obamageddon!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-23-2011 | 12:46 AM
  #841  
Partsman's Avatar
Senior Member
Back Marker
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 155
Partsman is an unknown quantity at this point
ATTENTION>>> ATTENTION This Is An Emergency Information Post...Pay special attention to this......Stock up on your parts now.......the end is coming......no dealers will be open......Japan will no longer have any raw materials to make replacement parts......Just remember when the end comes "I" will have all of the parts......AND YOU WILL PAY DEARLY........
Old 11-23-2011 | 05:56 AM
  #842  
autoteach's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,611
From: Belgium, WI
autoteach is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by RK1
DHS issues Turkey fryer warning | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner

This would be hilarious except that we have to pay for it and tens of millions of "Americans" are willing to kneel down and suck on it.

File under "our government is in the best of hands"

or "We're from the gooobermint and we're here to help".

Or "I'm the most powerful and well compensated Federal Bull D, and all you dumb bell truck drivers, waitresses and other losers who work with your hands better listen to what I say".
SO, the DHS twitter account tweeted this UL video and safety advice for those people using a deep fryer this thanksgiving? sounds like that tweet broke the bank.
Old 11-23-2011 | 01:41 PM
  #843  
autoteach's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,611
From: Belgium, WI
autoteach is on a distinguished road
I am fairly certain that if the president had tweeted this on his page you would have been just as upset. I have 5 sisters, I am not married, and have no children. I am sure that no one really cares to know more about DHS, and I think that we could do without it all together if we would just quit with our "foreign policy". That being said, I doubt that this mole hill of Turkey Frying is the mountain you are making it out to be. Now, how about getting those boys and girls home from overseas?
Old 11-23-2011 | 05:18 PM
  #844  
autoteach's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,611
From: Belgium, WI
autoteach is on a distinguished road
Not defending the man but the decision...
It is my understanding that the pipeline hasn't been killed, just its initial intended route through the Sand Hills. As for the jobs created:



In 2008, TransCanada’s Presidential Permit application for Keystone XL to the State Department indicated “a peak workforce of approximately 3,500 to 4,200 construction personnel” to build the pipeline.
Jobs estimates above those listed in its application draw from a 2011 report commissioned by TransCanada that estimates 20,000 “person-years” of employment based on a non-public forecast model using undisclosed inputs provided by TransCanada.
According to TransCanada’s own data, just 11% of the construction jobs on the Keystone I pipeline in South Dakota were filled by South Dakotans–most of them for temporary, low-paying manual labor.



I think being rational and careful about our oil exploration, production, and consumption doesn't strike me as a bad trait. Will I vote for Obama? I didn't the first time.
Old 11-23-2011 | 08:52 PM
  #845  
autoteach's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,611
From: Belgium, WI
autoteach is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by RK1
I'd been drinking heavily when I posted that last one. It seemed funny at the time. Looks dumb now so I've deleted it.

PS I agree with your comments about DHS, foreign policy and bringing people home.
Well, It looks like there are things that our nation of individuals could come to a consensus on. Now, only if our government could do it. I wonder who they are working for

I know we have been at each others necks lately, but I think it is constructive, so if I see the chance again, I will jump on your case. Likewise, I will make sure that I get behind you when you are on the money.
Old 11-23-2011 | 08:57 PM
  #846  
Partsman's Avatar
Senior Member
Back Marker
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 155
Partsman is an unknown quantity at this point
It happens

Originally Posted by RK1
I'd been drinking heavily when I posted that last one. It seemed funny at the time. Looks dumb now so I've deleted it.

PS I agree with your comments about DHS, foreign policy and bringing people home.
It happens.....some of us have more control then others????
Old 11-23-2011 | 08:58 PM
  #847  
autoteach's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,611
From: Belgium, WI
autoteach is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by VTRsurfer
Obama's "jobs bill", by his own admission, would largely consist of rebuilding roads and bridges.

Sounds like temporary employment to me.
FDR did it, and our country was better for it. It is the type of national debt that people should be getting behind, not the bailouts. I argued once upon a few years ago that when the economy hit the bricks, they should have started rebuilding the schools, roads, etc. When the loans went to crap, they should have paid them off (they could have paid off nearly all of them for what they gave the banks), putting spending money back in the pockets of the people, keeping the economy alive and at the same time putting the banks back in the black. When loan rates go down, and the communities are at a high unemployment, there is no time like then to make a move on reinvesting in the community. Sure, it is not sustainable, but you purposefully put people on the payroll rather than the soup line while improving the community and saving on expenses (upkeep of building, heat, electricity, etc with new structure). Maybe I am off base here, help me out.
Old 11-23-2011 | 09:21 PM
  #848  
thetophatflash's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperSport
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 834
From: Nooksack WA
thetophatflash is an unknown quantity at this point
Originally Posted by autoteach
FDR did it, and our country was better for it. It is the type of national debt that people should be getting behind, not the bailouts. I argued once upon a few years ago that when the economy hit the bricks, they should have started rebuilding the schools, roads, etc. When the loans went to crap, they should have paid them off (they could have paid off nearly all of them for what they gave the banks), putting spending money back in the pockets of the people, keeping the economy alive and at the same time putting the banks back in the black. When loan rates go down, and the communities are at a high unemployment, there is no time like then to make a move on reinvesting in the community. Sure, it is not sustainable, but you purposefully put people on the payroll rather than the soup line while improving the community and saving on expenses (upkeep of building, heat, electricity, etc with new structure). Maybe I am off base here, help me out.
No, you are doing just fine. Keep it up! By the way, depending on your time scale most jobs are temporary, but they are good for economic activity and create more "temporary" jobs and so on and so on.........
Old 11-23-2011 | 10:27 PM
  #849  
autoteach's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,611
From: Belgium, WI
autoteach is on a distinguished road
List of federal political scandals in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I dont know if that is the worst scandal, but the above should be reading material. Obviously it has the opportunity for being incorrect, but I am sure that each president has things that made them "the worst president of modern times" when they were pres. So, do I like the Solyndra deal, no. In fact, I am against all corporate welfare. Just wait until the new CAFE standards hit Chrysler (I have theorized that GM and Ford will make it) and they are looking for 3 times the charm.
Old 11-24-2011 | 03:13 PM
  #850  
autoteach's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,611
From: Belgium, WI
autoteach is on a distinguished road
The sad thing is I dont know what end of it is a joke. The side where our avg fuel economy hasnt increased in 20-30 years( although in recent years there are more higher FE cars avail.) or the end where the standard is set at an arbitrary goal. My view, europe is already doing it and I am not sure why we shouldnt. As for motorcycles, if the govt or consumers dont demand it, they dont supply it. Which came first?
Old 11-24-2011 | 07:09 PM
  #851  
autoteach's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,611
From: Belgium, WI
autoteach is on a distinguished road
I assume that you are talking about the 2025 standards, which I believe will fully necessitate diesel and lightweight vehicles. Some large vehicles are not included in the figures, but you have to admit that while technology, fuel efficiency, weight, and the such have gone up, fuel consumption should have gone down? You should never upgrade to a newer version of a vehicle and lose fuel mileage.
Old 11-25-2011 | 10:02 PM
  #852  
autoteach's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,611
From: Belgium, WI
autoteach is on a distinguished road
No problem!
Old 12-08-2011 | 05:48 PM
  #853  
autoteach's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,611
From: Belgium, WI
autoteach is on a distinguished road
I don't get it. Is that like a lapdance tour?
Old 12-13-2011 | 06:22 PM
  #854  
VTRsurfer's Avatar
Senior Member
MotoGP
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,451
From: San Clemente, CA
VTRsurfer is on a distinguished road
Obama said today that he would veto the bill for the Keystone Project (pipeline from Canada) if it passes the legislature.

Great idea for an Obama 2012 bumper sticker:

"RE-ELECT OBAMA IN ALL 57 STATES"
Old 12-28-2011 | 08:51 PM
  #855  
autoteach's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,611
From: Belgium, WI
autoteach is on a distinguished road
I still dont understand the idea of a debt ceiling. If you budget for a loss, shouldn't your debt ceiling include that? It would be like borrowing 100k from the mob but only willing to pay them 50k of it. So, what you are saying is that he wants to pay the bills. Now, I get that he will propose a budget, but congress needs to approve. If congress passes the budget (budget negative), how can they later choose to not cover the debt. Maybe we should be pissed at the congress members for not cutting off spending. This isnt the first president that has been budget negative, so get over it. If your daughter asks you for a pony, and you give her a pony, you probably will have to pay for the G D pony. So, that is what I have to say about budget ceilings.
Old 12-28-2011 | 10:07 PM
  #856  
autoteach's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,611
From: Belgium, WI
autoteach is on a distinguished road
Um, who doesn't get it? The debt ceiling is the dumbest Fing thing ever. Balanced budgets are pretty awesome, and congress makes those. Choosing to go in debt and not pay it? Yeah, who doesn't f-ing get it! And, how about checks and balances? Obama is making us socialist? Frack, You know what would be G D awesome? If we could try another 10 years of hardcore corporatism. I'm going to **** away my vote this year on either Ron Paul, or Buddy Roemer, or maybe both if they run together. Or maybe we should all vote Republican ticket?! Romney? Maybe we could get Palin in there, or another 8 years of Bush, because that worked so well. I don't watch Fox news and I don't think that this should be a sounding board for there bad information or made up stories. This just in, Obama "hired" as president in largest Affirmative Action move in history. What do you call it when you "hire" a mentally handicapped guy for 8 years?
Old 12-28-2011 | 11:45 PM
  #857  
blamecanada's Avatar
Senior Member
Superstock
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 344
blamecanada is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Rashardj
How could Obama possibly be the blame? The guy hasn't been in office but a couple of months. Lets put the blame where its most fitting; the guy from the last eight years. Obama is truly trying to fix this guys **** ups and you wont even give him a chance.
It's almost to the "don't bother" point man, there's basically rich bastards who vote republican in their self-interest, and brain washed people who don't realize its not a real party anymore...

Dems are ALMOST as bad if only because some of them are such dreamers...we need to take the money out of politics and stop letting corporations buy capitol hill or it will never change.
Old 04-30-2012 | 05:33 PM
  #858  
Randman's Avatar
Moderate-whore
MotoGP
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,049
From: Leander TX!!
Randman is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Rashardj
How could Obama possibly be the blame? The guy hasn't been in office but a couple of months. Lets put the blame where its most fitting; the guy from the last eight years. Obama is truly trying to fix this guys **** ups and you wont even give him a chance.
Well???
Old 04-30-2012 | 06:01 PM
  #859  
blamecanada's Avatar
Senior Member
Superstock
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 344
blamecanada is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by Randman
Well???
Well what?

If you want the problems we have fixed, you need to create your own third political party that isn't influenced by corporate donations.

Do you want big oil, delusional religious morons, and sketchy military firms controlling the country? Or big unions and wall street?

I'll be voting big unions and wall street again this time...sorry, maybe instead of talking about a rebellion we could all start our own political party instead of the dems and the gop that doesn't accept dirty money.
Old 04-30-2012 | 06:14 PM
  #860  
Randman's Avatar
Moderate-whore
MotoGP
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,049
From: Leander TX!!
Randman is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by blamecanada
Well what?

If you want the problems we have fixed, you need to create your own third political party that isn't influenced by corporate donations.

Do you want big oil, delusional religious morons, and sketchy military firms controlling the country? Or big unions and wall street?

I'll be voting big unions and wall street again this time...sorry, maybe instead of talking about a rebellion we could all start our own political party instead of the dems and the gop that doesn't accept dirty money.
That question wasn't for you, notice the quotes.

That said, I really don't give a rats *** anymore.. I'm gonna make my dime then skip out to the islands In a few years.. This place is going to take a big ole **** in the bed sooner than later, and I don't plan on being around for it.. Everyone is a slave to the money.. Want to fix ****, do away With the money.. And for **** sake, stop all the damn entitlements.. Bunch of lazy *** worthless waste of spaces we have in this great land..yes, we can toss the politicians in with that bunch..
Old 01-22-2013 | 07:00 AM
  #861  
HRCA#1's Avatar
Senior Member
SuperBike
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,082
From: Menifee, CA
HRCA#1 is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by VTRsurfer
Tonight at his "Commander-in-Chief Ball", Obama called our US Military "Comrades-in-Arms". I would consider this a Freudian slip, if I didn't know his background. He doesn't need to hide who he truly is anymore... since he got reelected.

Anyone who was around for the Cold War in the '50s and '60s, and has any idea of who Obama associated with and was influenced by earlier in his life, knows what I'm talking about.
I was and I do know what you're talking about. I'm just not sure if he's a commie or a wannabe dictator or better yet "Emperor" yeah that's it Emperor Obama!




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:37 AM.